Computes the large-sample variance of the log diagnosticity ratio for a lineup pair.
Arguments
- lineup_pres
A numeric vector of lineup choices for a lineup in which the target was present
- lineup_abs
A numeric vector of lineup choices for a lineup in which the target was absent
- pos_pres
A scalar, representing target position in TP lineup. Must be declared by user
- pos_abs
A scalar, representing target position in TA lineup. Must be declared by user
- k1
Number of targets in TP lineup. Must be specified by user (scalar).
- k2
Number of targets in TA lineup. Must be specified by user (scalar).
Details
Returns 1/h - 1/N_TP + 1/f - 1/N_TA for positive suspect-ID counts h and f. This is on the log-ratio scale, as in Tredoux (1998), not the raw ratio scale. A delta-method variance for the raw ratio is the squared diagnosticity ratio times this value.
References
Malpass, R. S. (1981). Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 5(4), 299-309.
Malpass, R. S., Tredoux, C., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2007). Lineup construction and lineup fairness. In R. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of Eyewitness Psychology, Vol. 2: Memory for people (pp. 155-178). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Tredoux, C. G. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22(2), 217-237.
Tredoux, C. (1999). Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, S9-S26.
Wells, G. L.,Leippe, M. R., & Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3(4), 285-293.